The strength of teeth is told on the scale of millimeters. Porcelain smiles are kind of like ceramics — except that while china plates shatter when smashed against each other, our teeth don’t, and it’s because they are full of defects.
Those defects are what inspired research led by Susanta Ghosh, assistant professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering-Engineering Mechanics at Michigan Technological University. The work came out recently in the journal Mechanics of Materials. Along with a team of dedicated graduate students — Upendra Yadav, Mark Coldren and Praveen Bulusu — and fellow mechanical engineer Trisha Sain, Ghosh examined what’s called the microarchitecture of brittle materials like glass and ceramics.
“Since the time of alchemists people have tried to create new materials,” Ghosh said. “What they did was at the chemical level and we work at the microscale. Changing the geometries — the microarchitecture — of a material is a new paradigm and opens up many new possibilities because we’re working with well-known materials.”
Glass is one such material. Making stronger glass brings us back to teeth — and seashells. On the micro level, the primary hard and brittle components of teeth and shells have weak interfaces or defects. These interfaces are filled with soft polymers. As teeth gnash and shells bump, the soft spots cushion the hard plates, letting them slide past one another. Under further deformation, they get interlocked like hook-and-loop fasteners or Velcro, thus carrying huge loads. But while chewing, no one would be able to see the shape of a tooth change with the naked eye. The shifting microarchitecture happens on the scale of microns, and its interlocking structure rebounds until a sticky caramel or rogue popcorn kernel pushes the sliding plates to the breaking point.
That breaking point is what Ghosh studies. Researchers in the field have found in experiments that adding small defects to glass can increase the strength of the material 200 times over. That means that the soft defects slow down the failure, guiding the propagation of cracks, and increases the energy absorption in the brittle material.
“The failure process is irreversible and complicated because the architectures that trap the crack through a predetermined path can be curved and complex,” Ghosh said. “The models we work with try to describe fracture propagation and the contact mechanics at the interface between two hard-brittle building blocks.”
Ghosh’s team developed two models. The first uses finite element modeling (FEM) and is detailed and highly accurate, but expensive. The second is surprisingly accurate, though less so than FEM techniques, and is much cheaper to calculate.
FEM is a numerical model that takes apart a complex whole by evaluating separate pieces — called finite elements — then puts everything back together again using the calculus of variations. Humpty Dumpty and all the king’s men would have liked FEM, but it’s no quick roadside trick. To run such complex calculations requires a supercomputer, like Superior at Michigan Tech, and ensuring that the right inputs get plugged in takes diligence, patience and a keen eye for coding detail. Using FEM for super strong glass means modeling all the possible interactions between the material’s hard plates and soft spots. Analytical modeling offers an alternative.
“We wanted a simple, approximate model to describe the material,” Ghosh said, explaining the team used more basic math equations than the FEM calculations to outline and describe the shapes within the material and how they might interact. “Of course, an experiment is the ultimate test, but more efficient modeling helps us speed up the development process and save money by focusing on materials that work well in the models.”
Both the FEM and analytical microarchitecture modeling from Ghosh’s lab can help make ceramics, biomedical implants and the glass in buildings as tough as our teeth.
Go to Source